HIGHLIGHTS:
CASE SUMMARY:
On September 25, 2025, the FTC announced a settlement with a large online retailer, requiring the company to pay a $1 billion civil penalty and provide $1.5 billion in consumer restitution. The settlement, which was struck mid-trial, resolves allegations that the company violated the FTC Act and ROSCA by engaging in deceptive subscription enrollment and cancellation practices.
Under the proposed consent order, the retailer is prohibited from making misrepresentations about material terms in a transaction involving a negative option feature—a contractual provision that allows the seller to interpret the consumer’s silence as an acceptance of a renewed offer. In the future, the retailer is required to provide simple mechanisms for a consumer to cancel any negative option feature, which “must not be difficult, costly, confusing, or time consuming.” Notably, the consent order also provides that, if the FTC “promulgates an amended rule or regulation governing negative options or subscriptions,” the requirements of that rule will supersede the relevant requirements of the consent order.
Additionally, the retailer is required to submit a compliance report one year following the settlement, among other things, detailing the activities of each negative option feature related to its subscription service and whether and how it is in compliance with the settlement order.
The $1 billion civil penalty is the largest ever imposed for an FTC rule violation. The $1.5 billion in consumer restitution is the second-highest restitution amount the FTC has obtained to date.
RESOURCES:
You can review all of the relevant administrative filings and press releases at the FTC’s Enforcement Page.
CounselorLibrary products and services are available directly through and from www.CounselorLibrary.com and are not legal advice. Counselorlibrary.com, LLC is an entity affiliated with Hudson Cook, LLP.